0.5% 5-Fluorouracil/10% Salicylic Acid for the Treatment of Distal Actinic Keratoses Under Daily Practice Conditions

Background: Actinic keratosis (AKs) are sun-induced skin lesions that are at risk to progress to invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Treatments have shown to be effective on face or balding scalp area but limited data support their efficacy on distal extremities. Objective: To describe the efficacy of 0.5% 5-fluorouracil/10% salicylic acid (5FU/AS) in the treatment of distally-located AKs in daily clinical practice. Additional objectives were to review tolerance and adherence to this treatment. Methods: Retrospective review of 23 patients with distal grade II to III AKs who were treated with 5FU/AS under daily practice conditions. Primary endpoint included local skin response according to percentage on AKs reduction at week 20 (8 weeks after ending the treatment). Results: 75% (30/40) treatment areas showed a percentage reduction in AKs from to 75% to 100% at week 20. Complete response (100% clearance) was recorded in more than half of the cases (53%, 21/40). Good, partial, and low responses were respectively observed in 22% (9/40), 20% (8/40), and 5% (2/40) of patients. Most adverse events were graded as low, and adherence to treatment was considered correct in 25 patients (63%). In addition, a correct adherence to treatment was significantly related to a better response (P=0.001). Conclusion: Findings indicate that topical 5FU/AS is an effective treatment for multiple distal AKs, with a proper safety profile. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(3):285-288.

Clinical management of cutaneous adverse events in patients on targeted anticancer therapies and immunotherapies: a national consensus statement by the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology.

Progress in the understanding of many tumors has enabled the development of new therapies, such as those targeted at specific molecules involved in cell growth (targeted therapies) or intended to modulate the immune system (immunotherapy). However, along with the clinical benefit provided by these new treatments, new adverse effects have also appeared. Dermatological toxicities such as papulopustular eruptions, xerosis, and pruritus are common with EGFR inhibitors. Other adverse effects have also been described with PDGFR, BCR-ABL, and MAPK tyrosine kinase inhibitors, antiangiogenic drugs, and inhibitors at immune checkpoints such as CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1. Onset of these adverse effects often causes dose reductions and/or delays in administering the prescribed therapy, which can affect patient survival and quality of life. It is, therefore, important to prevent the occurrence of these adverse effects, or to treat unavoidable ones as soon as possible. This requires cooperation between medical oncologists and dermatologists. This article reviews the various dermatological toxicities associated with targeted therapies and immunotherapies, along with their diagnosis and therapeutic management.

Novedades en el diagnóstico de las toxicodermias / Advances in the Diagnosis of Drug Eruptions

Las erupciones medicamentosas que afectan a la piel y las mucosas, o toxicodermias, se sitúan en primer lugar entre las reacciones adversas a medicamentos y suponen uno de los desafíos diagnósticos habituales para el dermatólogo. Los avances en el conocimiento de los mecanismos patogénicos implicados en las reacciones adversas a fármacos, en farmacogenética y en farmacoepidemiología, nos permitirán dar respuesta a los principales interrogantes planteados y así anticipar, e incluso prevenir, dichas reacciones. Muchas de las toxicodermias resultan de reacciones de hipersensibilidad mediadas por células T, con activación de diferentes mecanismos pro-inflamatorios que contribuyen a su heterogeneidad clínica. Algunos aspectos desafían el concepto habitual de procesado y presentación antigénica, habiéndose planteado nuevas hipótesis, como el «concepto p-i», que complementan la teoría hapténica y que permiten explicar, al menos en parte, por ejemplo la preferencia de la localización cutánea de las reacciones a fármacos o cómo algunas infecciones virales incrementan el riesgo de toxicodermia. En este trabajo se realiza una revisión de estos aspectos patogénicos, del papel de los genes HLA en la predisposición a algunas reacciones adversas graves, así como de otros avances en el diagnóstico de las toxicodermias. Algunos cuadros llamativos de descripción reciente en relación con nuevas medicaciones son comentados someramente (AU)

Drug eruptions affecting the skin or mucosas (toxicoderma) are the most common adverse effects of drugs and represent one of the more common diagnostic challenges for the dermatologist. A better understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms of drug reactions, pharmacogenetics, and pharmacoepidemiology will help us to resolve the main dilemmas and to anticipate and even prevent such reactions. Many drug eruptions are due to T cell–mediated hypersensitivity reactions that can involve activation of different proinflammatory mechanisms, which would explain the varied manifestations. Some aspects defy the classical understanding of antigen processing and presentation. New immunological hypotheses, such as the «p-i concept», have been introduced to complement the hapten theory and, at least in part, help to explain why drug reactions tend to affect the skin and why certain viral infections increase the risk of drug eruptions. In this paper we analyze these pathogenic concepts and the role of HLA genes in the susceptibility to certain severe adverse drug reactions, and also examine other advances in the diagnosis of drug eruptions. We briefly discuss a number of recently described reactions to new drugs (AU)

Advances in the diagnosis of drug eruptions.

Drug eruptions affecting the skin or mucosas (toxicoderma) are the most common adverse effects of drugs and represent one of the more common diagnostic challenges for the dermatologist. A better understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms of drug reactions, pharmacogenetics, and pharmacoepidemiology will help us to resolve the main dilemmas and to anticipate and even prevent such reactions. Many drug eruptions are due to T cell-mediated hypersensitivity reactions that can involve activation of different proinflammatory mechanisms, which would explain the varied manifestations. Some aspects defy the classical understanding of antigen processing and presentation. New immunological hypotheses, such as the «p-i concept¼, have been introduced to complement the hapten theory and, at least in part, help to explain why drug reactions tend to affect the skin and why certain viral infections increase the risk of drug eruptions. In this paper we analyze these pathogenic concepts and the role of HLA genes in the susceptibility to certain severe adverse drug reactions, and also examine other advances in the diagnosis of drug eruptions. We briefly discuss a number of recently described reactions to new drugs.